Parker & Carranza (1989)
Procedure
- Compared primary school children and college students.
- Looked at identifying a target individual following a mock crime.
Findings
- Child witnesses were more likely to chose someone.
- Child witnesses were less accurate.
Memon et al (2003)
Procedure
- Studied young (16-33), older (60-82) eyewitness accuracy.
Findings
- When the delay between an incident and its identification was short there was no difference in the accuracy of the two age groups.
- 1 week later, younger witnesses were more accurate.
Yarmey (1993)
Procedure
- Stopped 651 adults in public places and asked them to recall physical characteristics of a woman who they had spoken to 2 minutes earlier.
Findings
- Young (18-29) and middle-aged (30-44) were more confident in recall.
- No significant differences in accuracy of recall that could be attributed to the age group of the witness.
Anastasi and Rhodes (2006)
Procedure
- 3 age groups, (18-25, 35-45, 55-78) shown 24 photos.
- Rated for attractiveness.
- Filler activity.
- 48 photos presented - 24 had been there previously.
Findings
- Young and middle-aged participants were significantly more accurate than older participants.
- All age groups were good at identifying their own age group.
Procedure
- Compared primary school children and college students.
- Looked at identifying a target individual following a mock crime.
Findings
- Child witnesses were more likely to chose someone.
- Child witnesses were less accurate.
-----------------------------------
Procedure
- Studied young (16-33), older (60-82) eyewitness accuracy.
Findings
- When the delay between an incident and its identification was short there was no difference in the accuracy of the two age groups.
- 1 week later, younger witnesses were more accurate.
----------------------------------
Procedure
- Stopped 651 adults in public places and asked them to recall physical characteristics of a woman who they had spoken to 2 minutes earlier.
Findings
- Young (18-29) and middle-aged (30-44) were more confident in recall.
- No significant differences in accuracy of recall that could be attributed to the age group of the witness.
----------------------------------
Anastasi and Rhodes (2006)
Procedure
- 3 age groups, (18-25, 35-45, 55-78) shown 24 photos.
- Rated for attractiveness.
- Filler activity.
- 48 photos presented - 24 had been there previously.
Findings
- Young and middle-aged participants were significantly more accurate than older participants.
- All age groups were good at identifying their own age group.
No comments:
Post a Comment